|
fiery -> RE: Girl missing since 1991 turns up alive (9/2/2009 8:54:53 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: ChristineB What I don't understand though is if she had access to email and a phone as the papers say, she was running the print business, why didn't she call for help? And why did she, after 18 years? I think there is probably a lot more to this story. All I can think of is brainwashing, but I still wonder.... She didn't call for help after 18 years. A campus security guard checked up on him because he was acting weird and trying to hand out religious brochures there. The family was with him and the girls all looked so strange that when the check showed he had a record, they called the police. Has to be brainwashing, Christine. We don't know what he's told her. Say he'd threatened to kill her or her mother if she told anyone. Or if he'd said he had already killed them and she thought she had nowhere to run to. Remember he's had nearly two decades to shape her to his will. Plus she had her kids to think of - maybe he threatened to kill them or said her family would never want her again because she had them. Whatever the reason I think it's ignorant, distasteful and shameful that the press would even insinuate it was her fault that she didn't get away sooner. She was 11 and a mother at 14 by him after being subjected to horrors we can't imagine. Shame on them because they are reinforcing myths that all sickos live by that rape and molest that the victim and not them is at fault. "She asked for it. It was her fault. She wanted it really. She loved me." What's truly horrific here is the press's attitude towards a victimized child just so they can squeeze another angle out of it. I'm absolutely disgusted by it. She was not at fault. EVER.
|
|
|
|